LINKEDIN, AMAZON,
REDDIT, FACEBOOK, GOOGLE, YOUTUBE, NETFLIX AND OTHER PALO ALTO VC
FUNDED MEDIA COMPANIES HAVE AGREED TOGETHER TO CENSOR INFORMATION
AND DELETE ACCOUNTS THAT DO NOT FOLLOW THE IDEOLOGY THAT THEY ARE
PUSHING. THEY DO THIS BECAUSE THE PALO ALTO VENTURE CAPITALISTS ARE
ALL PART OF THE SAME CARTEL OF SOCIOPATH FRAT BOYS WITH A TWISTED
CONCEPT OF GLOBAL CONTROL! DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO BANKRUPT THEIR
COMPANIES IN SUPPORT OF YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS
LINKEDIN DELETES OUR
FRIENDS ACCOUNTS BECAUSE THEY POSTED NEWS ARTICLES ABOUT SEX
TRAFFICKING AND BRIBERY BY LINKEDIN BOSSES!
LinkedIn is one of the few US
social media companies that have broke into the lucrative Chinese
market. The site boasts of some 41 million users in the country. ...
Jun 4, 2014For LinkedIn, the
Tiananmen censorship is the first real test of a policy
announced in February when the social network launched its
Chinese-language website.. In order to operate in China, the ...
Jun 4, 2014Business networking site LinkedIn
has said it will stop users seeing content posted from China that
breaches the country's strict censorship laws, after
members complained that posts related to ...
Aug 30, 2018•Perhaps the craziest
example of social media censorship: Facebook flagged as
"hate
speech" the Declaration of Independence on July 4 th and pulled
it down, until the backlash hit. The very document that gave birth
to
our nation---which then gave us free speech, which the big tech
companies thrive on---was pulled as "hate speech."
LinkedIn censored the profile
and activities of a vocal critic of the Chinese government for users
in China, in another apparent response to a censorship
request
from the government. Corporate fraud investigator Peter Humphrey,
who
is British and lives in the UK, was informed by LinkedIn in
December ...
LinkedIn claims to own every
user's profile, and puts self-serving restrictions on what
information users can put in the profile. Not to mention the
dangerous indemnity requirement. Ignore the weak ending that
advises people not to stand on principle.
LinkedIn is not a bastion of
privacy by any stretch of the imagination. It's a popular website
for
business networking, which means that it's easy to find online users
and reveal their real-life location, work history, and other
personal
information to others on the web.
AIX,HPUX,Solaris
in the Cloud, Auto-Deployed in 10 Minutes or less at SiteOx.com
84
58
18
This support thread from LinkedIn proves that LinkedIn is
monitoring and restricting views of your postings based on their own
“Approved” political beliefs, and it explicitly says so in
LinkedIn's own support thread.
Please share this with your network so we can put as much
pressure as possible on LinkedIn to change this censorship policy.
The following is a support thread from LinkedIn regarding a political
discussion about James Comey, director of the FBI. The discussion was
critical of his decision not to recommend prosecution of Hillary
Clinton over the use of a private email server. The full text of the
censored discussion posted on LinkedIn follows this blog posting here,
and can be viewed on LinkedIn at Click here. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/clinton-lynch-comey-time-line-does-add-up-dana?trk=mp-author-card
The posts from the support thread are in chronological order:
It starts with me submitting a support request to LinkedIn asking why
one of the comments on a posting I created was removed.
Auto-response from LinkedIn.
Some back and forth and submitting additional evidence of
censorship.
You can scroll down to the disturbing parts ...
Scroll Down ...
Scroll Down ...
Scroll Down ...
Scroll Down ...
Notice the claim here that "LinkedIn would never proactively delete
a comment..."
Scroll Down ...
Scroll Down ...
Here the LinkedIn support person admits that LinkedIn removed the
comment and for a very disturbing reason ... LinkedIn does not allow
discussions about certain "political beliefs", as of yet,
unidentified.
So I asked for a list of those political beliefs that are not
allowed on LinkedIn ...
A new LinkedIn support person takes over and completely contradicts
all previous responses by LinkedIn. They also attempt to repeat a lie,
even though the response was proven to be a lie earlier in the thread
...
At this point the LinkedIn support person abruptly closed
the case, I reopened it immediately...
Then suddenly, for no apparent reason, the number of views on
this posting went from almost zero, to almost 20 in a couple of
hours. And this was weeks after it was originally posted, so the
interest in the topic of the article had waned by that time.
The above graph tells me that after I caught them in the act
of censoring my posts, LinkedIn subsequently changed some "view
limiter" setting that allowed this post to receive more views.
However I doubt they removed the limitation completely, given the
censorship mentality revealed.
In this reply from Linkedin, they are not even attempting to
pretend they do not have a censorship list based on political
views.
They say the list exists and is internal and private!!!
They also say there was a "miscommunication" about the
comment being deleted by LinkedIn. Since we already know that
LinkedIn deleted the comment, I interpret this to mean that the
support person was not supposed to tell me they deleted it.
Are we, the LinkedIn users, on some sort of super-secret
double probation that only LinkedIn knows about?
Again the LinkedIn support person closed the case.
Again I immediately reopened the case, and recognizing a dead end, I
asked that my issue be escalated to the next support level.
And it appears that we will be discussing the list of
disallowed political beliefs with a new LinkedIn support person soon
...
And it begins again ... sigh. The new LinkedIn support
person attempts to disavow any knowledge of censorship at LinkedIn,
and it is a person from the same group identified previously as the
group who initiated the censorship!
I tell the new support person that censorship is not the issue
anymore, it has been proven and acknowledged by LinkedIn. The issue is
making the list of disallowed political views public so that LinkedIn
customers know whether or not to express an opinion on these topics.
Another response from LinkedIn, another denial, kinda, sorta
... This time they admit to censorship "through automated tools",
then deny the automated tools locate or remove content based on
political views. OK, then on what basis are the automated tools
removing content? Please provide that list of rules, that is all I
am asking for!
Here I ask for the censorship rules for reviewing content
associated with the automated tools referenced in the last response
by LinkedIn Support:
Just when I think that LinkedIn support can't get any more
despicable, they prove me wrong! They just got even more despicable,
they closed the support ticket without response and without
notification in the hope that I wouldn't notice and it would just go
away. I NOTICED!
I reopen the case and ask it to be immediately escalated to LinkedIn
Management.
In the latest response, LinkedIn Support completely ignores
my request to escalate this to LinkedIn Management, and they do not
address the fact they attempted to close the case without response
or notification. Again they admit they censor content using
automated tools but refuse to tell the LinkedIn users what the
censorship rules are governing those tools. Again they close the
case without resolution.
I reopen the case and identify the latest reply from LinkedIn Support
as being not responsive to my request to escalate this case to
LinkedIn Management. Again I request escalation...
This support case has been open for over a month now and
LinkedIn support is ignoring it.
I exposed millions in fraud and
CRIMINAL RETALIATION by BellevueWASchools. They wasted over a
million dollars destroying me for a decade as a union officer
who defended the rights of dozens of workers. LinkedIn
retaliated with a corrupt sponsor of illegal activity at
BellevueWASchools. They routinely limited views on my posts and
just eliminated thousands of followers with my account. I've
helped the FBI take down much bigger criminals than these
wanbabes.
I wrote an article titled THE
DEATH OF PLANT VARIETY NAMES I got some
good support initially and then it disappeared
Now it doesnt matter what I write I dont one response
Being Under "Administrative
Restrictions"!
"Are we, the LinkedIn users, on some sort of super-secret double
probation that only LinkedIn knows about?"!..!
This makes sense because I
noticed after I posted a document off of document Cloud about
Trump's old lawyer speaking to Congress for 3 days and trumps
net worth. Posted this three days ago everything else I have
posted which has nothing to do with politics, has not been
viewed since. Today is March 2 2019
Author;
CE Instructor; Bank Insurance Consultant; Complex Insurance
Analyst
Dana, I read the entire thread,
and I can very much understand your frustration and concern.
LinkedIn’s responses not only obfuscate the obvious, but also
pander without really addressing the reality. I will look
forward to any future developments (but not really
optimistically that anything will actually be done by LinkedIn -
they seem to be in the same position as Facebook)....
liberalism is baked into the
social media cake. Free speech is under assault, most obviously
on many college campuses, but also in the news media, which
presents a conformist view to its audience and gets a
politically segregated audience in return.
So many inexplicable occurrences
for we who are more Conservative politically. As a for instance,
a few weeks ago - I was posting articles and comments, but no
one was replying or commenting on the articles which were
extremely unusual. A couple of my friends emailed me privately
to ask me why I had deleted my profile. I hadn't deleted my
profile, but none of my friends and contacts could not see the
profile, my comments or the articles posted. I could still log
in and everything looked normal from my end. Everything looked
to post as usual.
I emailed LI help center to ask why no other person in the
Linkedin universe could see my profile but me and mentioned the
term "veiled discrepancy". Immediately my profile was taken down
so even I couldn't see my profile any longer.
Next LI sent me a message that I would have to furnish a copy of
my driver's license front and back and they would see if they
could restore my profile. I complied and was immediately
restored.
The kicker was I then asked repeatedly why they took my profile
down and they repeatedly said, "It was just a LI mistake".
Really? A mistake?
Now I ask you, why would LI take down my profile - a paying
customer - and require DL pictures after being on LI since 2009
with 23,500+ contacts, recommendations and endorsements of
people I have done business with at this time without viewing
the profile and telling me why they were taking my profile down.
BTW - I don't use bad language or personally attack anyone. Any
idea why they would do such a thing to an Independent
Constitutional Conservative?
Reading the original discussion
will help to understand why LI did what they did. By
interpreting the message's tone and political-severity of the
topic(s); I think would help to know the "why" in all this. I
think it's terrible what happened and any discussions on
politics should be treated fairly and with respect for one
another's views.
EVERY EXECUTIVE AND INVESTOR FROM LINKEDIN IS NOW HAVING THESE
TACTICS UNDERTAKEN AGAINST THEM. AS A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, YOU OWE
IT TO YOURSELF TO HELP WIPE OUT CORRUPT LINKEDIN:
HOW WE ARE ENDING CORRUPTION IN AMERICA - THE
PROCESS
- Every member of the public should join in these citizen sleuth
and crowd-sourced anti-corruption actions to wipe out corrupt
LINKEDIN
This is what they did to us simply because we reported a
crime to federal law enforcement....so we watched, we learned, we
waited and now we have struck back! If it was legal for them to try
to execute us, our lives and our brands this way, then it must be
legal for us to do it right back to every single one of them for the
rest of their lives. There is now nothing they can do to stop what
is
coming. Even if we are dead, a billion others have already taken our
place!
These are the 100% legal steps, tactics, methodologies and
procedures being used to end political corruption in America. Every
citizen, in every nation, is encouraged to engage in these efforts:
- Draft versions of FBI "302 Reports", on each and every
suspect in the associated list of targets, (in these related
documents) are being authored and submitted to the FBI. We will teach
you how to write and submit them too!
- These sites, and the associated evidence repositories, have been
electronically made available to every FBI agent, Interpol Agent and
law enforcement agency in the world.
- Criminal complaints and investigation demands are being authored
and submitted to the DOJ, FTC, FEC, SEC, SSA, OSC, CIA, GAO, Congress
and each Inspector General.
- We have forced over 100 agency heads to resign simply by
providing them with copies of the Draft versions of FBI "302
Reports" on them that we intend to submit.
- We have produced an analysis chart template, with the help of
Wikileaks, ICIJ, Sunshine Groups, Follow-the-Money and other database
efforts. This chart depicts a graphic analysis of each suspects
collusion's, bribes and compromised assets.
- We are teaching and providing forensics and criminal
investigation training to the public so that the public is as
resourced as any special agent. A vast number of "how to be a
private investigator" books have been published on Amazon,
E-Book sites and shared online.
- Confirming copies of all submitted reports are digitally
carbon-copied to the press, the public and global "dead-man
switch" torrent archives.
- We created a new series
of public lawsuits, anti-trust lawsuits, RICO lawsuits and
class-action lawsuits by the public and against the targets. These
lawsuits have now placed permanent public transparency on record and
changed the law to help the public and stop the crooks.
-
We have exposed their Silicon Valley Bay Area, New York And Florida
executive sex trafficking rings.
- Billions of members of the public are monitoring the suspects
via public database information and public shared observation of
their activities, locations, owner-ships and transactions via each
member of the public's personal computers.
- We identified and listed every person, organization and company
involved in the attacks and RICO law violations and provided that
list to The U.S. Congress and every agency.
- We opened our own private investigator and crowd-sourced
investigations into the following:
- Every stock market account they or
their family owns
- Every Uber or Lyft ride they ever
took for any meeting or transport of sex workers
- Every flight manifest they appeared
on
- Every bank account they have ever
held
- Every lawsuit, divorce record and
police record they have ever appeared in
- Every trust fund they or their
family holds
- Every shell corporation they, or
their family holds
- Every item in the Swiss Leaks that
cross connects to their holdings
- Every item in the Panama Papers
Leaks that cross connects to their holdings
- Every item in the WikiLeaks that
cross connects to their holdings
- Every item in the Snowden Leaks that
cross connects to their holdings
- Every sex trafficking incident that
connects to each of them alone, and in groups
- Every financial transaction between
any of the parties on the master list and the character
assassination and hit job firms of: Google, Univision, Gawker
Media, Unimoda, Jalopnik, Gizmodo,Black Cube, Fusion GPS, Media
Matters, Think Progress, IN-Q-Tel, K2 Intelligence, WikiStrat,
Podesta Group, YouTube, Alphabet, David Drummond, Larry Page,
Facebook, Correct The Recor, Stratfor, ShareBlue, Sid Blumenthal,
David Brock, Eric Schmidt, Sunshine Sachs, Covington and Burling,
Buzzfeed, Perkins Coie and Wilson Sonsini or their derivatives
with common owners.
- Every use of Mossack Fonseca and
related crooked CPA's, Banks and Tech Law Firms they engaged in
- Every item in the Quest Leaks that
cross connects to their holdings
- Every sex service that their credit
card payments every connect too
- Every person leaving or entering
locations where they sleep
- Every real estate transaction that any name or company they, or
their family, were involved in, tracks to
..... and hundreds of thousands of other information points about
them that prove that they benefit from crimes that they engage in for
others who engage in crimes using the America public policy system.
It all goes into shared 100% legal public collaborative databases
that work like XKEYSCORE, or MS Access, or Oracle Databases.
The proof of collusion, organized criminal actions and raw covert
corruption is indisputable. The actors are all the same people. The
beneficiaries are all the same people. The communications between the
parties all coordinate the same actions.
The suspects will never get away with these crimes and these
actions and investigations will be conducted on a permanent basis and
passed from person-to-person and generation-to-generation.
Every new candidate for office suspected of similar bribes and
collusion's will undergo the same circumspection.
We are not a club or membership group. You are us. If you are
reading this, just start doing the things listed here and do them as
professionally as you can.
We are freely providing the tools, technologies and mass
publishing systems, to the billions of members of the public who
would like to be involved in anti-corruption actions. All of the
technology is open-source.
Keith BellevueSchool Dougherty
Founder at Confidential
I exposed millions in fraud and CRIMINAL RETALIATION by BellevueWASchools. They wasted over a million dollars destroying me for a decade as a union officer who defended the rights of dozens of workers. LinkedIn retaliated with a corrupt sponsor of illegal activity at BellevueWASchools. They routinely limited views on my posts and just eliminated thousands of followers with my account. I've helped the FBI take down much bigger criminals than these wanbabes.
23hjeff koelewyn
owner /manager at hermitage nursery pty ltd
I wrote an article titled THE DEATH OF PLANT VARIETY NAMES I got some good support initially and then it disappeared Now it doesnt matter what I write I dont one response
3moLinkedIn User
Being Under "Administrative Restrictions"! "Are we, the LinkedIn users, on some sort of super-secret double probation that only LinkedIn knows about?"!..!
6moCorinne K.
Researcher
This makes sense because I noticed after I posted a document off of document Cloud about Trump's old lawyer speaking to Congress for 3 days and trumps net worth. Posted this three days ago everything else I have posted which has nothing to do with politics, has not been viewed since. Today is March 2 2019
8moDick Clarke, CPCU, CIC, RPLU
Author; CE Instructor; Bank Insurance Consultant; Complex Insurance Analyst
Dana, I read the entire thread, and I can very much understand your frustration and concern. LinkedIn’s responses not only obfuscate the obvious, but also pander without really addressing the reality. I will look forward to any future developments (but not really optimistically that anything will actually be done by LinkedIn - they seem to be in the same position as Facebook)....
11moDana French (AIX in the Cloud)
AIX,HPUX,Solaris in the Cloud, Auto-Deployed in 10 Minutes or less at SiteOx.com
FYI: I stopped posting any articles on LinkedIn immediately after this happened.
11moStephen LaPenta
Owner, South Detectives
liberalism is baked into the social media cake. Free speech is under assault, most obviously on many college campuses, but also in the news media, which presents a conformist view to its audience and gets a politically segregated audience in return.
2yGlenn R. Bowman
Retired Petroleum Engineer
We have to fight this. Censorship of Conservative/Christian views is spreading like fire.
2yBev Farrar
Broker/Owner/ABR - 30,000
So many inexplicable occurrences for we who are more Conservative politically. As a for instance, a few weeks ago - I was posting articles and comments, but no one was replying or commenting on the articles which were extremely unusual. A couple of my friends emailed me privately to ask me why I had deleted my profile. I hadn't deleted my profile, but none of my friends and contacts could not see the profile, my comments or the articles posted. I could still log in and everything looked normal from my end. Everything looked to post as usual. I emailed LI help center to ask why no other person in the Linkedin universe could see my profile but me and mentioned the term "veiled discrepancy". Immediately my profile was taken down so even I couldn't see my profile any longer. Next LI sent me a message that I would have to furnish a copy of my driver's license front and back and they would see if they could restore my profile. I complied and was immediately restored. The kicker was I then asked repeatedly why they took my profile down and they repeatedly said, "It was just a LI mistake". Really? A mistake? Now I ask you, why would LI take down my profile - a paying customer - and require DL pictures after being on LI since 2009 with 23,500+ contacts, recommendations and endorsements of people I have done business with at this time without viewing the profile and telling me why they were taking my profile down. BTW - I don't use bad language or personally attack anyone. Any idea why they would do such a thing to an Independent Constitutional Conservative?
2yGlenn R. Bowman
Retired Petroleum Engineer
Scary.
2yLinkedIn User
Reading the original discussion will help to understand why LI did what they did. By interpreting the message's tone and political-severity of the topic(s); I think would help to know the "why" in all this. I think it's terrible what happened and any discussions on politics should be treated fairly and with respect for one another's views.
2yJohn Danscecs
Retired
Sounds like Communism to me... Democrats must be in charge... If we don't like what you say, they'll delete it... No free speech, no freedoms...???
2y